In 1924, $20 bought an ounce of gold. Today that ounce costs $3,000+. What happened to the dollar โ told entirely through data.
Every conversation about gold investing eventually comes back to one question: does gold actually preserve purchasing power? The answer is in the data โ 100 years of it โ and it's not subtle.
| Item | 1924 | 1974 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gallon of milk | $0.54 (185 gal) | $1.39 (72 gal) | $4.25 (24 gal) |
| Gallon of gas | $0.21 (476 gal) | $0.53 (189 gal) | $3.50 (29 gal) |
| Loaf of bread | $0.09 (1,111 loaves) | $0.28 (357 loaves) | $3.00 (33 loaves) |
| Median home | ~2% of a home | ~0.3% of a home | ~0.02% of a home |
| $100 in 2024 terms (CPI) | $1,780 | $620 | $100 |
One hundred dollars in 1924 had the purchasing power of approximately $1,780 today. The dollar has lost roughly 94% of its value over the past century. That's not a conspiracy theory โ it's the Bureau of Labor Statistics' own CPI data.
| Year | Gold Price (1 oz) | Men's Suit | Gallons of Gas | Months of Groceries |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1924 | $20.67 | 1 quality suit | ~98 gallons | ~1 month |
| 1974 | $154 | 1 quality suit | ~291 gallons | ~1 month |
| 2000 | $280 | 1 quality suit | ~187 gallons | ~1 month |
| 2024 | $2,300+ | 1 quality suit | ~657 gallons | ~1 month |
| 2026 | $3,000+ | 1 quality suit | ~850 gallons | ~1+ months |
The "gold buys a suit" observation isn't a cute anecdote โ it's a data point that's been true for at least a century. An ounce of gold has consistently purchased roughly the same basket of real goods regardless of what year you check. The dollar price of gold has risen 145x since 1924 โ not because gold became more valuable, but because the dollar became worth less.
Here's the core divergence visualized through a single number:
What that $100 buys today. A 94.4% loss of purchasing power over 100 years.
What those same 5 ounces are worth today. Same physical gold, 145x higher dollar price.
The person who held $100 in cash lost 94% of their purchasing power. The person who held 5 ounces of gold (worth $100 in 1924) preserved โ and dramatically increased โ theirs. This isn't hindsight bias; it's the fundamental property of scarce physical assets vs infinitely expandable fiat currency.
The answer is money supply expansion. The Federal Reserve has increased the US monetary base from roughly $4 billion in 1924 to over $5 trillion today โ a 1,250x expansion. Gold's above-ground supply has increased roughly 5x over the same period (from ~40,000 tonnes to ~210,000 tonnes). When you create 1,250x more currency units chasing 5x more gold, the gold price in that currency rises. It's arithmetic, not speculation.
The acceleration post-1971 (when Nixon severed the dollar-gold link) is especially stark. From 1924 to 1971 โ 47 years on the gold standard โ the dollar lost roughly 57% of its purchasing power. From 1971 to 2026 โ 55 years off the gold standard โ the dollar lost another 87%. The rate of purchasing power destruction roughly doubled once the gold anchor was removed.
If the next 25 years follow the same trajectory as the last 25 (the dollar lost ~44% of purchasing power from 2000-2025), a retirement portfolio worth $500,000 today will buy approximately $280,000 worth of goods in 2050 โ even if the nominal account balance stays at $500,000.
Gold's role in a retirement portfolio isn't to generate returns โ it's to preserve purchasing power through whatever currency debasement occurs over your holding period. Whether that justifies the costs of a Gold IRA depends on your allocation, size, and time horizon. Run the numbers: Gold IRA Fee Calculator.
Compare Gold IRA companies for your investment size.
See 2026 Rankings โ